Scientists: Size Of Oil Spill Vastly Underestimated
From the NY Times:
Two weeks ago, the government put out a round estimate of the size of the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico: 5,000 barrels a day. Repeated endlessly in news reports, it has become conventional wisdom.
But scientists and environmental groups are raising sharp questions about that estimate, declaring that the leak must be far larger. They also criticize BP for refusing to use well-known scientific techniques that would give a more precise figure.
The criticism escalated on Thursday, a day after the release of a video that showed a huge black plume of oil gushing from the broken well at a seemingly high rate. BP has repeatedly claimed that measuring the plume would be impossible.
Text continues after gallery …
- Tory Lanez Reportedly Stabbed In Jail, Rushed To Hospital
- Trump Administration’s Push To Suspend Habeas Corpus Is Fascist
- The Black Ballot – Episode 5: Political Prostitutes
- Michael B. Jordan Shows Love To Sinners & Drops Big Creed-Verse Plans At Amazon Upfront
- The African American Policy Forum’s 5th Annual CRT Summer School Series Was A Call To Action For Social Justice
The figure of 5,000 barrels a day was hastily produced by government scientists in Seattle. It appears to have been calculated using a method that is specifically not recommended for major oil spills.
Ian R. MacDonald, an oceanographer at Florida State University who is an expert in the analysis of oil slicks, said he had made his own rough calculations using satellite imagery. They suggested that the leak could “easily be four or five times” the government estimate, he said.
RELATED STORIES
